Given the prolific use of Facebook, I wonder how each of you choose what to ‘like’. What standards are applied when ‘liking’ something. Is something ‘likeable’ at a certain level of quality, creativity, thoughtfulness, etc. etc., or does it simply need to elicit a quick click that requires little consideration?
When we critique or analyze our own work or others work does ‘like’ have a place in the language we use to discuss what we see, what we feel, and what works, or what doesn’t to create the experience of the piece being engaged with? Does it add to the conversation or rob the recipient of useful feedback?
To further shape this discussion here are a few articles on the topic of ‘like’
- Diss ‘Like’ by Ted Gup 1/8/2012
- Think before you “Like” on Facebook by Chris Taylor 12/29/11
- Liking is for Cowards. Go for what Hurts. by Johnathan Franzen 5/28/11
Facebook has defiantly changed the internet world. They have changed the way companies advertise to use and they defiantly want to make sure that you like their pages. Even people are always wanting to get the most likes. Facebook to me is like an social advertisement. You want people to like your pictures, your status, your ideas, you want people to like you. The same as products, they want you to like their stuff they want their products to be the most liked because people fall under if they see a lot of people liking a product than they will want to like it as well. I enjoy Facebook, but anymore it is the means of giving coupons, and some people advertise to much on Facebook.
So would you say the Facebook “Like” fosters narcissism and feeds commercialism? If so what value does “like” have beyond helping companies sell more? Further what does it mean to be “liked”?